MRF, one of India's leading tire manufacturers, reported a mixed performance for the first quarter of the fiscal year. The MRF Q1 FY26 Results show that strong top-line growth failed to translate into improved bottom-line performance. While the company's consolidated revenue saw a healthy increase, driven by stable domestic demand and market presence, its profitability was significantly impacted by persistent cost headwinds. Rising expenses, particularly in raw materials and operational costs, squeezed margins and led to a notable decline in net profit, underscoring the challenge of maintaining financial health amidst inflationary pressures and a competitive market landscape.
Table of Contents
- Company Overview: MRF Limited
- Market Expectations Before MRF Q1 FY26 Results
- Financial Highlights of MRF Q1 FY26
- Peer Comparison
- Conclusion: MRF Result Analysis
- FAQs
MRF Limited (Madras Rubber Factory) is India's largest tire manufacturer, headquartered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. What started as a small toy balloon manufacturing unit in 1946 by K. M. Mammen Mappillai quickly pivoted to tread rubber and eventually tire manufacturing. Today, its core business model revolves around the design, production, and sale of a vast range of tires for passenger cars, two-wheelers, trucks, buses, and off-road vehicles, serving both individual consumers (replacement market) and vehicle manufacturers (OEMs). Beyond its primary tire business, MRF has also diversified into other products like paints and coatings (MRF Vapocure), and toys through its well-known subsidiary, Funskool. The company is renowned for its brand strength, extensive distribution network, and a long-standing association with motorsports, which reinforces its image of durability and performance.
Ahead of its first-quarter earnings announcement for fiscal year 2025-26, market expectations for tyre major MRF Ltd. were cautiously optimistic on revenue growth but wary of significant pressure on profitability.
The consensus was built around the following factors:
- Moderate Revenue Growth: Expectations were for a single-digit revenue growth, primarily driven by steady demand in the replacement market and a potential uptick in rural consumption. A July 2025 report by CRISIL had projected a 7-8% revenue growth for the tyre industry in FY26.
- Significant Margin Pressure: The market was anticipating a contraction in operating and net profit margins. This was attributed to a sharp increase in the cost of key raw materials, including natural rubber and crude oil-linked derivatives like synthetic rubber and carbon black, which surged in the preceding months.
- Subdued OEM Demand: Offtake from Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) was expected to be muted due to flat or negative sales across several vehicle categories, barring the farm segment.
- Geopolitical & Market Disruptions: The company itself cited tariff-related issues in April and geopolitical tensions in May, followed by an early onset of monsoons, as factors that impacted overall market sentiment during the quarter.
Market Reaction to Q1FY26 Results
On 13th August, following the announcement of MRF’s Q1FY26 results on 12th August, the company's shares opened at ₹1,41,700.00. The stock corrected due to declining profitability, reaching a low of ₹1,38,100.00 and closing at ₹1,38,840.00, reflecting a loss of 1.21% compared to the previous close of ₹1,40,535.00.
MRF posted decent Q1FY26 results despite global pressures and an increase in raw material costs.
- Revenue from operations: ₹7,675.69 crores, up 6.66% YoY from ₹7,196.45 crores.
- Net Profits: ₹500.47 crores, down by 12.36% from ₹571.02 crores.

Key Operational and Financial Metrics
Particulars
|
Q1FY26
|
Q1 FY25
|
Net worth (Rs. Crores)
|
18,671
|
17,005
|
Debt equity ratio
|
0.03x
|
0.04x
|
Debt service coverage ratio
|
5.39x
|
7.62x
|
Interest service coverage ratio
|
18.68x
|
20.95x
|
Current ratio
|
1.49x
|
1.41x
|
Long-term debt to working capital
|
0.14x
|
0.24x
|
Current liability ratio
|
81.81%
|
76.52%
|
Total debts to total assets ratio
|
4.01%
|
2.88%
|
Debtors turnover
|
9.25x
|
9.65x
|
Inventory turnover
|
5.27x
|
6.14x
|
Operating margin
|
8.03%
|
10.51%
|
Net profit margin
|
6.30%
|
7.86%
|
MRF Ltd.’s key operational and financial ratios reflect a stable balance sheet position with modest and healthy metrics. The debt-to-equity ratio stood at a negligible 0.03x, indicating virtually no debt. Liquidity ratio remains robust, where the current ratio stood at 1.49x. If we see the profitability ratios, it has declined marginally, showcasing pressure on margins due to global tensions and high raw materials costs.
/content-assets/378c4017bb4a427a885b4c3ae347e9ab.png)
Based on the peer comparison for Q1 FY26, the tyre industry faced a highly challenging and divergent quarter, primarily marked by severe pressure on profitability. While JK Tyre & Industries stood out with a robust 6.32% YoY revenue growth to ₹3,869 crore, other major players like Apollo Tyres and CEAT witnessed top-line erosion. The most critical trend, however, was the widespread margin compression, evidenced by substantial declines in net profit for most companies; Apollo Tyres saw a staggering 95.70% plunge in profitability, while Balkrishna Industries (-41.22%) and JK Tyre (-25.23%) also recorded significant drops
MRF's Q1 FY26 results reveal a challenging operational landscape, where a 6.66% year-over-year revenue growth to ₹7,675.69 crore was overshadowed by a significant 12.36% decline in net profit to ₹500.47 crore. This downturn in profitability, marked by a contraction in EBITDA margins to approximately 13.9%, is not an isolated issue but a reflection of severe, industry-wide headwinds that have similarly impacted competitors like Apollo Tyres, CEAT, and JK Tyre. The primary culprits for this margin erosion are a sharp increase in the cost of key raw materials, particularly natural rubber, coupled with heightened geopolitical tensions, including new US tariffs on Indian tyres and regional conflicts that disrupted supply chains in May. Consequently, while underlying domestic demand remains robust, the near-term outlook for MRF is one of cautious navigation, with management's focus squarely on stringent cost control and operational efficiency to mitigate the persistent pressure on profitability.
Q1: What were MRF's key financial results for Q1 FY26?
For the first quarter of fiscal year 2025-26, MRF reported a consolidated revenue of ₹7,675.69 crore, marking a healthy 6.66% year-on-year growth. However, its consolidated net profit saw a significant decline of 12.36% to ₹500.47 crore.
Q2: Why did MRF's profit decline despite strong revenue growth in Q1 FY26?
MRF's profitability was squeezed by persistent cost headwinds. The primary reason for the decline was a sharp increase in the cost of key raw materials, such as natural rubber and crude oil derivatives. Rising operational costs and market disruptions also contributed to the pressure on margins.
Q3: How did MRF's Q1 FY26 performance compare to its peers in the tire industry?
MRF's performance was in line with the broader industry trend of margin compression. Competitors like Apollo Tyres and Balkrishna Industries also reported significant drops in net profit, with Apollo Tyres experiencing a staggering 95.70% plunge. This indicates that rising input costs were an industry-wide challenge, not unique to MRF.
Q4: What specific factors impacted the market sentiment and MRF's performance during Q1 FY26?
The company itself cited several disruptive factors during the quarter. These included tariff-related issues in April, geopolitical tensions in May that disrupted supply chains, and the early onset of monsoons. These events weighed on overall market sentiment and impacted profitability.
Q5: What is the outlook for MRF following its Q1 FY26 results?
The outlook for MRF is one of cautious navigation. While domestic demand remains stable, the company's near-term focus will be on stringent cost control and improving operational efficiency to mitigate the ongoing pressure from high raw material costs and competitive market dynamics.