Swiggy’s Q3 FY26 financial results are particularly relevant for equity investors, market analysts, startup founders, and anyone tracking India’s platform economy. This analysis helps answer common questions such as how Swiggy is growing revenue so fast, why losses are still widening, whether quick commerce can turn profitable, and what this means for Swiggy’s long-term valuation in comparison to rivals.
The Q3 FY26 performance of Swiggy reflects a deliberate strategy of aggressive scale expansion across food delivery and quick commerce, even at the cost of near-term profitability. The results highlight both the strength of Swiggy’s consumer network and the financial strain created by intense competition in India’s hyperlocal services market.
Table Of Contents
- Financial Snapshot Of Swiggy Q3 FY26 Results
- Segment-Wise Performance Analysis
- What Drove Revenue Growth In Q3 FY26
- Why Swiggy’s Losses Continued To Widen
- Swiggy’s Business Model Explained
- Revenue Streams And Monetisation Levers
- Promoters, Leadership And Governance
- Market Reaction And Analyst Commentary
- Competitive Landscape And Strategic Positioning
- Outlook And Long Term Implications
- FAQs
Swiggy reported strong top-line growth in Q3 FY26, ending December 2025, even as losses expanded due to elevated investment intensity.
The company recorded consolidated revenue from operations of ₹6,149 crore, representing 54% YoY growth and 11% QoQ growth. This acceleration reflects higher-order volumes, improved average order values, and deeper penetration of quick commerce.
However, net losses widened to ₹1,065 crore, up 33% YoY, highlighting the cost of scaling dark stores, delivery fleets, marketing, and technology.
| Metric |
Q3 FY26 Performance |
| Revenue from operations |
₹6,149 crore |
| Net loss |
₹1,065 crore |
| B2C GOV |
₹18,122 crore |
| Adjusted EBITDA loss |
₹712 crore |
| Platform MTUs |
24.3 million |
Adjusted EBITDA margins at the B2C level improved marginally to -3.5% of gross order value, signalling early operating leverage despite aggressive investments.
Swiggy’s diversified business model spans food delivery, quick commerce, out-of-home dining, and supply chain services. Each segment contributed differently to growth and profitability in Q3 FY26.
/content-assets/0256fa1e2952490e9096735bf554b053.png)
Food Delivery Performance
Food delivery remained Swiggy’s most stable and profitable segment. Gross order value grew 20.5% YoY to ₹8,959 crore, the highest growth rate in nearly three years.
This expansion was driven by:
-
Monthly transacting users rising 22% YoY to 18.1 million
-
Higher order frequency per user
-
New propositions focused on speed, affordability, and health
Adjusted EBITDA margins for food delivery reached 3% of GOV, improving by 56 basis points YoY. Contribution margins rose to 7.6%, supported by advertising revenue growth and improved delivery efficiency.
Innovations such as Bolt for faster deliveries and the 99 Store for low-ticket meals helped Swiggy retain price-sensitive users while protecting unit economics.
Quick Commerce And Instamart Growth
Quick commerce emerged as Swiggy’s fastest-growing segment. Instamart GOV surged 103% YoY to ₹7,938 crore, supported by expansion into non-grocery categories and improved average order values.
Key operational highlights included:
-
Average order value increasing 40% YoY to ₹746
-
Non-grocery items contributing 32% of total orders
-
Addition of 34 dark stores, taking the total to 1,136 across 131 cities
Contribution margins improved to -2.5%, a 208 basis point YoY improvement. Despite this, adjusted EBITDA losses for Instamart widened to ₹908 crore due to store expansion, rider incentives, and customer acquisition costs.
See whether Swiggy’s quick commerce losses are narrowing or expanding sequentially. Review Swiggy Q2 FY26 result, Instamart and segment-level performance analysis on Finology Ticker.
Other Business Segments
Swiggy’s out-of-home dining business, Dineout, achieved an adjusted EBITDA margin of 0.7% with a network of over 48,000 restaurant partners. Supply chain services recorded 76% YoY revenue growth but continued to operate at negative margins.
Swiggy’s revenue expansion was the result of both demand-side and supply-side factors.
On the demand side, platform MTUs increased 37% YoY to 24.3 million. B2C order volumes reached 294 million, reflecting deeper user engagement and cross usage between food delivery and quick commerce.
/content-assets/f10371ba01634841bdda952520b12ae2.png)
On the supply side, Swiggy expanded its merchant coverage, dark-store density, and delivery partner availability. New consumer propositions such as Eatright, which now accounts for one in nine food orders, helped attract health-conscious users.
Quick commerce growth was driven by:
Despite strong revenue growth, Swiggy’s losses expanded due to rising operating costs.
Total expenses increased 49% YoY to ₹7,298 crore, driven by:
-
Marketing and promotional spends
-
Dark store setup and rentals
-
Delivery partner incentives
-
Technology and platform investments
Swiggy also experimented with zero-delivery-fee thresholds above ₹299 in quick commerce. However, irrational pricing by competitors limited order growth, leading to a reassessment of these initiatives.
Adjusted EBITDA losses stood at ₹782 crore for the quarter, reflecting the deliberate choice to prioritise scale and market share over short-term profitability.
Swiggy operates a technology-driven, asset-light marketplace that connects consumers, merchants, and delivery partners. Its model relies on network effects, where higher user volumes attract more merchants, improving selection and efficiency.
The platform monetises through commissions, delivery fees, advertising, and subscriptions, while optimising costs through routing algorithms and fleet utilisation.
AI-driven logistics planning and demand forecasting enable Swiggy to operate across more than 700 cities with scalable efficiency.
Swiggy’s revenue mix is diversified across multiple sources, reducing dependence on any single stream.
| Revenue stream |
Description |
| Partner commissions |
15 to 25% per order from restaurants and merchants |
| Delivery fees |
Distance and time-based charges to users |
| Advertising |
Sponsored listings and in-app promotions |
| Subscriptions |
Swiggy One memberships with recurring revenue |
| Quick commerce |
Merchant commissions and convenience fees |
Advertising and subscriptions are increasingly important margin levers as the platform matures.
Swiggy does not have a designated promoter under SEBI norms following its IPO. Strategic leadership rests with co-founder and CEO Sriharsha Majety, who holds approximately 6.23% equity.
Majety, an IIT Kharagpur alumnus, has led Swiggy since its pivot from a logistics startup into a consumer internet platform in 2014. Co-founder Nandan Reddy continues to oversee product and innovation.
Institutional investors such as Prosus and SoftBank participated in recent capital raises, signalling long-term confidence in Swiggy’s strategy.
Swiggy strengthened its balance sheet through a ₹10,000 crore QIP and a ₹2,400 crore stake sale in Rapido, taking pro forma cash reserves to approximately ₹15,900 crore.
The Q3 FY26 results triggered a negative stock market reaction as losses exceeded expectations. Some brokerages, including CLSA, downgraded the stock, citing concerns around prolonged breakeven timelines for quick commerce.
Investor sentiment was cautious due to:
-
Rising Instamart EBITDA losses
-
Intense competitive pricing
-
Uncertainty around quick commerce profitability
However, analysts acknowledged improving food-delivery margins and Swiggy’s strong liquidity position, which allows for sustained investment without immediate dilution risk.
Track how Swiggy’s revenue growth, losses, and balance sheet stack up over time. View Swiggy share price in detailed financial statements, cash position, and business overview on Finology Ticker.
Swiggy operates in a fiercely competitive environment dominated by Zomato and its quick-commerce arm, Blinkit.
Competition has driven heavy discounting and rapid dark store expansion across players. While this compresses margins in the short term, it accelerates category adoption and raises entry barriers for new entrants.
Swiggy’s differentiated strategy lies in:
-
Strong food delivery unit economics
-
Cross-platform user acquisition
-
Broad merchant and assortment coverage
Management has guided for 18 to 20% food delivery GOV growth with continued margin expansion toward 4.5 to 5% over time. Instamart is targeting contribution breakeven by Q1 FY27, supported by increasing store-level profitability and improved assortment mix.
Swiggy continues to invest in delivery partners' welfare, including insurance and earnings stability, positioning itself favourably amid evolving gig-economy regulations.
In the long run, Swiggy’s diversified presence across food, groceries, dining, and logistics positions it to capture a large share of India’s urban convenience market, provided it balances growth ambitions with capital discipline.
- What was Swiggy’s revenue growth in Q3 FY26?
Swiggy reported 54% YoY revenue growth, driven by higher order volumes and strong quick commerce expansion.
- Why did Swiggy’s losses increase despite revenue growth?
Losses widened due to higher marketing spends, dark store expansion, rider incentives, and technology investments.
- Is Swiggy’s food delivery business profitable?
Food delivery achieved a positive adjusted EBITDA margin of 3% of GOV, showing improving profitability.
- When is Swiggy’s quick commerce business expected to break even?
Management targets the contribution margin breakeven for Instamart by Q1 FY27.
- How strong is Swiggy’s balance sheet?
Swiggy holds approximately ₹15,900 crore in pro forma cash, providing a long runway for investments.